In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around a unique case involving a homeowner's request for a variance to eliminate a one-foot no-access easement on their property. The case, presented by homeowner Kristen Gibson, stems from complications surrounding the permitting of a structure intended for her mother-in-law, who requires closer proximity to family after the passing of her husband.

Gibson explained that when they purchased the property in May 2022, they were unaware that the building was not permitted by the county. The issue came to light when they sought to apply for a septic permit, leading to a realization that the existing structure did not meet county regulations. The homeowner expressed a desire to rectify the situation and comply with all necessary requirements, including paying any associated penalties.

The proposed change would allow for a driveway that would provide access to the residence without infringing on the privacy of the family. Gibson emphasized the emotional and practical necessity of the request, highlighting the need for her mother-in-law to live closer to family for support and safety.

The meeting concluded without opposition from the public, and the governing body was encouraged to consider the request favorably, taking into account the unique circumstances surrounding the case. The outcome of this variance request could set a precedent for similar cases in the future, as the board deliberates on balancing regulatory compliance with the needs of residents.