Residents of a local neighborhood expressed their concerns during a recent government meeting regarding a proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) that could significantly alter the area. The discussions centered around the implications of the 2016 PUD compared to a previous proposal from 1842, with many residents advocating for a deferral to allow for further clarification and community engagement.

One resident, Miss Wildman, highlighted the potential benefits of the 2016 PUD, emphasizing its design that aims to maintain a tranquil environment while addressing traffic issues through improved specifications for calming devices and signage. She noted that while development is inevitable, the 2016 proposal offers a better outcome for current residents. However, she called for more discussions to ensure that all community members fully understand the implications of the development.

Brenda Carruthers, another resident, raised concerns about the density of the proposed apartments, questioning the accuracy of unit counts provided by the developer. She referenced a previous meeting where the developer indicated a maximum of 350 units, contrasting this with claims of 522 units, which she argued would exacerbate traffic problems in the area. Carruthers also expressed gratitude for a reduction in building height from 70 feet to 45 feet, which she believes would lessen the impact on neighboring homes.

The meeting also addressed the need for adequate access points for emergency services, with officials explaining that fire codes necessitate two access points for single-family homes. This requirement has led to some contention among residents, who are concerned about the potential increase in traffic on Wildwood Drive.

Officials clarified that the 2016 PUD includes a 15-foot landscape buffer and a 50-foot no-build area, which aims to protect existing trees and enhance the neighborhood's character. They emphasized that the new proposal would require replanting trees if any are removed, a commitment not present in the previous PUD.

As the meeting concluded, officials acknowledged the residents' requests for more time to discuss the proposal, indicating a willingness to continue engaging with the community. The outcome of these discussions will be crucial in determining the future of the neighborhood and the balance between development and community needs.