In a recent government meeting, community members voiced their concerns and opinions regarding two proposed Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) in Northeast Oklahoma City. The older PUD, which has already been approved, includes 522 apartments and 8 houses, totaling 530 units. In contrast, the new proposal features 545 apartments and 47 houses, bringing the total to 592 units. Residents expressed worries about increased population and traffic density, particularly with the new development providing two direct access points into their neighborhood.

The discussions highlighted the potential benefits of the older PUD, which allows for civic and commercial uses, including community recreation, veterinary services, and child care centers. Residents noted that the inclusion of fast-casual eateries could address the area's status as a food desert, providing essential services and job opportunities. The older PUD is seen as more business-friendly, while the newer proposal has raised concerns about its lack of commercial options.

A significant point of contention was the uncertainty surrounding the new developer, who has changed hands multiple times since 2021. Residents expressed skepticism about the developer's ability to complete the project, citing a lack of transparency regarding financial backing and previous successful developments. This uncertainty has led some community members to advocate for the older PUD, which they believe offers a more stable and beneficial framework for their neighborhood.

The meeting also addressed signage regulations associated with the developments. Proponents of the older PUD argued that it includes stricter signage regulations, which would help maintain the aesthetic of the neighborhood, especially with an Olympic event scheduled nearby in 2028. In contrast, the newer PUD was criticized for its more lenient signage rules, which could lead to unregulated commercial signage.

While some residents supported the new PUD for its potential to increase single-family homes and reduce traffic disruptions, others remained firm in their preference for the older PUD, emphasizing the importance of community investment and the need for a more controlled development approach. The meeting concluded with calls for further discussions to ensure that all community voices are heard and considered in the decision-making process.