In a recent government meeting, community opposition to a proposed development project was a focal point of discussion, highlighting significant concerns regarding the developer's engagement with local residents. Critics expressed frustration over what they described as the developer's \"arrogant and indifferent\" approach, which they believe has prioritized expediency over collaboration.

Residents voiced that there has been a lack of meaningful dialogue between the developer and the neighborhood, with only a few meetings occurring at the insistence of the Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission (TMAPC) or the city council. This sentiment was echoed by a former city council member who criticized the developer for failing to address community concerns adequately. He noted that, in his experience, successful proposals typically involve proactive outreach and cooperation with neighbors, rather than a confrontational stance.

The former council member also pointed out that city staff had not sufficiently engaged with the community, citing a lack of response to his requests for communication. He expressed disappointment in the current city councilor's absence from discussions surrounding the project, emphasizing the need for local leaders to be more involved in addressing constituents' concerns.

As the meeting concluded, attendees expressed hope for further opportunities to voice their opinions in upcoming sessions, particularly one scheduled for December. The ongoing tension between the developer and the community underscores the challenges of urban development and the importance of fostering collaborative relationships in the planning process.