In a recent government meeting, discussions centered on the complexities of auditing the University of Washington's financial systems, particularly in relation to its use of the Workday accounting system. Concerns were raised about the university's distinct accounting practices, which differ from those of the state government, making audits challenging. The university's current implementation of Workday, while beneficial, has led to questions about the compatibility of its foundational data model (FDM) with state systems.

Brian Henny, a representative from the university, emphasized the importance of transparency and the need for a more cohesive mapping of financial data between the university and state accounts. He noted that while the university's FDM values are slightly different, there is potential for improved transparency in financial reporting.

Christie Fredericks, another university official, acknowledged the audit team's professionalism during a recent prospective audit. However, she expressed disappointment that the audit did not yield new insights beyond what the university had already identified through its risk management processes. Fredericks highlighted the importance of context in understanding the project's challenges, particularly regarding training timelines for staff adapting to the new system.

Fredericks also pointed out that the audit report suggested reducing training time as a contingency option, a recommendation the university does not support. She stressed the necessity of thorough training aligned with best practices to ensure successful implementation of the new system.

In closing, Fredericks recommended that the State Auditor's Office consider involving industry experts in future audits to enhance the understanding of complex ERP implementations. The meeting underscored the ongoing challenges and considerations in aligning university financial systems with state requirements, as well as the importance of expert input in the auditing process.