In a recent government meeting, residents of Kenner expressed deep concerns over proposed zoning changes that could transform residential areas into light industrial zones. The discussions highlighted fears of increased flooding, noise, and disruption to community life, as well as frustrations over a perceived lack of responsiveness from local officials.

Darrell Price, a local resident, voiced his discontent, emphasizing that the council often overlooks the needs of the community in favor of business interests. He urged council members to consider the quality of life for residents, stating, \"Sometimes you gotta consider the people who vote you in, who pay taxes.\" Price's comments resonated with others who shared similar sentiments about the potential negative impacts of industrial development on their neighborhoods.

Pearl Galston, another resident, raised concerns about the deterioration of local infrastructure, particularly the roads, which she argued would suffer from increased truck traffic associated with new commercial developments. She recounted her family's long history in the area and lamented the lack of consultation from the city regarding changes that directly affect their properties.

Leroy Sanders and Jerome Posey echoed these worries, highlighting the historical context of their neighborhoods and the adverse effects of rezoning on property values and community stability. Sanders recounted his own experience of losing a residential lot to commercial development without fair compensation, while Posey stressed the need for improved infrastructure rather than more industrial zoning.

Residents also pointed out ongoing flooding issues, with many asserting that the city has failed to maintain adequate drainage systems. Sarah Wilkins Tucker, a long-time resident, described the dire situation during storms, urging officials to prioritize infrastructure improvements over commercial interests.

The meeting concluded with calls for better communication and collaboration between the city and its constituents. Patricia Butler questioned whether their concerns were being taken seriously, given the rapid changes already occurring in the area. She and others advocated for a more inclusive approach to development that respects the voices of long-standing residents.

As the council considers the proposed zoning changes, the community remains vigilant, demanding that their needs and concerns be prioritized in future planning decisions.