In a recent government meeting, discussions centered on the relevance of the Department of the Interior's (DOI) 1990 criteria and procedures for Indian water rights settlements. Secretary Nuland indicated that many tribes believe these guidelines are outdated and primarily serve to protect the DOI from liability rather than fostering partnerships with tribes. She emphasized the need for a shift in policy to view tribes as partners rather than adversaries, suggesting that changes could be made through rule adjustments or new legislation.

The meeting also addressed a proposed revenue-sharing agreement between a tribe and a private landowner, with committee members expressing openness to amendments that would clarify the bill's intent. A drafting error in the bill was acknowledged, and an amendment was prepared to correct it, ensuring that the tribe would benefit from mineral development at the site.

Concerns were raised regarding two settlement acts, AS 4633 and 4705, with opposition noted from water commissioners in Wyoming and Utah. The DOI is actively engaged in discussions with tribes and state representatives to address these concerns and work towards a consensus-based approach for resolving water issues in the Colorado River basin.

Additionally, the department highlighted potential budgetary issues related to the settlement acts, specifically regarding appropriations for cost overruns. The complexity of the geographical areas involved in these projects was acknowledged, with a commitment to continue collaboration with tribes and bill sponsors to address these challenges.

Senator Tester praised the leadership of Chairman White Clay from the Crow reservation, recognizing his efforts in promoting clean drinking water and youth programs within his tribe. He noted the recent passage of bipartisan amendments aimed at delivering clean water to the Crow community, underscoring the critical importance of water access for tribal populations.