In a recent government meeting, a proposal to replace a deteriorating deck with Azek TimberTech composite decking was approved, despite some concerns regarding environmental implications. The existing deck, made of fir wood and nearly 50 years old, was described as rotting and unsafe. The homeowner emphasized that the replacement would not alter the deck's size or visibility, as it is not prominently visible from surrounding roads or properties.

During the discussion, one board member expressed support for the use of composite materials, highlighting their durability and low maintenance compared to traditional wood. However, another member raised a cautionary note regarding the potential environmental impact of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) materials, specifically mentioning PFAS leachate concerns in relation to the nearby coastal pond watershed. While acknowledging the importance of these environmental considerations, the board ultimately decided that the proposal did not fall under their jurisdiction for further review.

The motion to approve the deck replacement was passed with a majority vote, with one member dissenting. The homeowner expressed gratitude for the board's decision, allowing them to proceed with the necessary renovations.

In addition to the deck discussion, the meeting also covered various landscaping and hardscape proposals within the same neighborhood. Board members reviewed plans for driveway aprons and fencing, emphasizing the need for consistency with existing structures in the area. Concerns were raised about a proposed fence that extended too close to the street, prompting further deliberation on its placement.

Overall, the meeting highlighted the balance between maintaining community standards and addressing environmental concerns, as board members navigated the complexities of local regulations and community aesthetics.