During a recent North Richland Hills city council meeting, property owners voiced strong opposition to the city's rental inspection program, arguing it imposes unnecessary burdens and delays on landlords and tenants alike.

Matt Bryant, a local landlord, urged the council to consider ending the program, claiming it could reduce the inspection queue by 12 to 15 percent. He criticized the program as government overreach, citing instances where properties failed inspections for minor issues, such as a tree touching a gutter or flaking paint. Bryant emphasized that the current system delays tenant move-ins, resulting in lost rental income.

Ron Cohen, another property manager, echoed these sentiments, describing the inspection process as cumbersome and inefficient. He expressed frustration over strict denial policies that require landlords to fix issues before reinspection, often leading to significant delays and additional costs. Cohen also highlighted the challenges of navigating the online permit system, which he found complicated and time-consuming.

Eileen Miller, who manages multiple rental units, shared her experience with the inspection process, noting that it has become increasingly difficult to coordinate inspections and meet with inspectors. She criticized the lack of flexibility in scheduling and the penalties imposed for delays, which can occur due to the city's operational issues.

Residents also raised concerns about the impact of nearby rental properties on their neighborhoods. Richard Thomas reported issues with a hotel operating next to his home, citing noise and maintenance problems that detract from the residential character of the area.

The discussions reflect a growing discontent among landlords regarding the rental inspection program, with many calling for a reevaluation of its necessity and effectiveness. The council is now faced with the challenge of balancing property management regulations with the needs and concerns of both landlords and residents.