During a recent Grand Junction City Council meeting, discussions centered on the financial viability of the local baseball team, the Jackalopes, and the implications of a proposed subsidy from the city. Council members expressed significant concerns regarding the team's ongoing financial struggles and the request for a $100,000 subsidy, which they argued would divert taxpayer dollars from essential city services.

City staff outlined the operational costs associated with maintaining the stadium, emphasizing the need for cost recovery to support public services. The council debated the merits of subsidizing a for-profit business, with several members questioning the rationale behind using taxpayer funds to support a team that has consistently underperformed in attendance and revenue generation.

Councilman Stout highlighted the importance of fiscal responsibility, stating that the city should not be expected to cover losses incurred by a business that has taken on substantial debt without a viable business model. He referenced a recent article discussing the Jackalopes' attendance issues and the need for innovative strategies to attract fans, suggesting that the current ownership's approach may not be sufficient to turn the team's fortunes around.

Concerns were also raised about the potential financial impact on the city if the Jackalopes were to cease operations. While some council members acknowledged the emotional appeal of supporting a local team, they emphasized the need for a thorough evaluation of the financial implications, including lost revenue from rent and other fees.

The council ultimately sought to gauge support for the subsidy proposal, with a clear sentiment emerging against it. Members expressed a desire to explore alternative uses for the stadium that could generate revenue without compromising the city's financial health. The meeting concluded with a call for further discussion on the matter, particularly regarding the future of the stadium and its role in the community.