Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Historic Structure Faces Demolition Amid Controversial Modifications

October 17, 2024 | Delray Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Historic Structure Faces Demolition Amid Controversial Modifications
In a recent government meeting, planners discussed a certificate of appropriateness for a property located at 220 X Clinton Avenue, which is part of the Old School Square Historic District. The property features two structures: a two-story residence and a detached one-story storage building, both constructed in 1922.

Michelle Hewitt, the planner, provided a brief history of the site, noting that in 2014, the board approved a site plan application that allowed for a change in use from single-family residential to professional office. Most recently, in March 2023, the board approved exterior modifications, including window and door replacements and roof changes. However, during construction, significant damage was discovered in the accessory structure, necessitating the demolition of three of its four walls.

To address this, the property owner and architect sought after-the-fact approval for the demolition and a variance request, as the accessory structure currently sits 1.8 feet from the property line, well within the required 10-foot setback. The proposed modifications do not alter the existing footprints of the structures or the hardscaping.

Hewitt presented visual plans showing the proposed changes, which include the removal of shutters and alterations to door configurations. The staff report indicated that while these changes slightly modify the proportions of windows and doors, they remain compatible with the architectural style of the structures.

The variance request aims to allow the accessory structure to remain in its current position, preserving the visual rhythm of the street. The board noted that moving the structure to meet the setback requirement would significantly reduce its size, potentially compromising its historical integrity.

Public comments included concerns about the necessity of the variance and the proximity of other buildings in the area. The meeting concluded with a discussion on the implications of the proposed changes and the importance of maintaining the historical character of the district.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Florida articles free in 2025

Republi.us
Republi.us
Family Scribe
Family Scribe