During a recent city council meeting, tensions flared over the proposed repeal of the Occupational Privilege Tax (OPT), with council members expressing frustration over communication and procedural transparency. Council member Jurenski, who was reportedly not informed about the repeal until late in the process, voiced her strong opposition to the proposal, emphasizing her commitment to public safety funding.

Council member Gardner had reached out to Jurenski to discuss the repeal, suggesting that the funds could be redirected towards public safety initiatives. However, Jurenski firmly rejected this idea, citing ongoing discussions about the city's lodging tax and the need for equitable tax rates compared to neighboring Denver. She expressed disappointment over not being notified earlier about the resolution, which she believed had been in the works for over a week without her knowledge.

Council member Bergin, who supported the repeal, acknowledged Jurenski's concerns but argued that the urgency of public safety needs in certain communities could not be overlooked. He highlighted the long-standing wait for essential services, such as fire stations, in areas that have been fully developed for over two decades.

The meeting underscored the complexities of local governance, particularly regarding budgetary decisions that impact public safety and community services. As discussions continue, the council faces the challenge of balancing fiscal responsibility with the pressing needs of their constituents.