During a recent city commission meeting, significant discussions emerged regarding a proposed development project in Miramar, which has sparked considerable concern among local residents. The project, which involves the construction of 84 residential units, has raised questions about its impact on community safety, property values, and the existing neighborhood dynamics.

Key points of contention included the maintenance of the road associated with the development. The developer assured the commission that they would maintain ownership of the property for a minimum of 50 years and would be responsible for road upkeep, including repaving as necessary. This commitment was included in the development agreement, addressing previous concerns raised by residents.

However, the meeting highlighted a broader issue of communication between the developer and the community. Residents expressed frustration over what they perceived as inadequate engagement from the developer, with claims that multiple attempts to meet had been met with indifference. The president of the local homeowners association (HOA) contested the developer's assertion that residents were unwilling to engage, stating that communication had been mischaracterized.

Crime statistics were also a focal point of the discussion. Police Chief Delridge Mosse reported 12 crimes in the Foxcroft area and 28 in the nearby Miramar Club over the past year, primarily involving thefts and auto burglaries. The chief noted that efforts to mitigate crime included increased patrols and collaboration with neighboring cities to address a trend in vehicle thefts, particularly of Hyundai models.

Residents voiced their concerns about the potential negative effects of the new development on their community, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of density and safety. Many expressed that the proposed project would not benefit existing homeowners, who fear it could lead to increased crime and a decline in property values.

The developer has agreed to change the project's name from \"Foxcroft\" to \"Residences at Palm Cove\" to avoid confusion with the existing community. This decision was made in response to resident feedback.

As the meeting progressed, several residents took the opportunity to voice their opposition to the development, citing concerns about the lack of trust in the developer and the potential for increased traffic and noise in their neighborhood. The commission is expected to continue deliberating on the project, weighing the developer's commitments against the community's concerns.