During a recent city council meeting in Bremerton, significant discussions centered around Initiative Measure 2117, which has potential fiscal implications for the city. Council member Eric Younger expressed his concerns about the initiative, emphasizing that while he supports informing the public about its financial impacts—specifically the risk of losing $500,000 for the Warren Avenue Bridal project and $5.9 million for the View Ridge Elementary project—he opposes the council taking a definitive stance on how citizens should vote. He urged residents to rely on the voters' pamphlet for information rather than the council's opinions.

Councilor Frey echoed Younger’s sentiments, highlighting the importance of the council's role in educating the public without overstepping boundaries. She acknowledged the need for clarity in communication regarding city projects funded by the initiative but questioned whether the council should formally endorse or oppose the measure.

Councilor Goodnow contributed to the discussion by noting the council's responsibility to address climate change, suggesting that while the council's opinions may influence public perception, any formal resolution should ideally reflect a unanimous decision to maintain unity.

The meeting culminated in a vote regarding a resolution to support the school bond associated with the initiative. However, the motion ultimately failed due to a tie, with several council members abstaining or voting against it. The council's inability to reach a consensus highlights the complexities surrounding the initiative and the varying perspectives on the council's role in influencing voter decisions.