In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around property ownership and restrictive covenants, particularly concerning a parcel owned by a resident, Miss Phillips. The meeting revealed that Miss Phillips purchased her property with an existing mobile home, which was not in compliance with the restrictive covenants that had been recorded in 2019. These covenants, which were signed by the previous owner, Justin Saret, prohibit the placement of mobile homes on the property, allowing only temporary use during the construction of a permanent dwelling.

The board acknowledged a failure in communication regarding the covenants, which should have been disclosed during the property transaction. Miss Phillips expressed confusion over why the issue had only recently come to light, suggesting that it may have stemmed from complaints by neighbors. The board members discussed the importance of maintaining the area’s transition to single-family homes and the need to enforce the covenants to prevent properties from becoming rental units.

In a bid to find a resolution, the board proposed granting Miss Phillips a two-year period to either sell the mobile home or construct a permanent residence. However, some members suggested a shorter timeframe of one year, given that she is not currently residing in the mobile home. The board emphasized the necessity of adhering to zoning regulations, which do not permit mobile homes in the transitioning area designated as residential estate (R-E1).

The meeting concluded with a consensus to allow Miss Phillips time to comply with the covenants while underscoring the importance of proper communication and adherence to property regulations in the future.