During a recent council meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority (OTA) and its handling of the Access Oklahoma Turnpike Plan. Council members expressed frustration over the OTA's perceived lack of transparency and accountability, with one member highlighting the chaotic nature of the agency's budget and its inconsistent timelines for project start dates.

The council member emphasized that the existing resolution, which opposes all aspects of the Access Oklahoma Turnpike Plan, remains in place, marking a small victory for those opposed to the project. They cautioned attendees about the upcoming study session, suggesting that it may not yield the desired answers, based on previous experiences with the OTA's public engagement efforts, which they described as evasive and confrontational.

Another council member, Amy Serrano, voiced her deep frustration, likening her experience with the OTA to being in an abusive relationship. She recounted efforts made over the past two and a half years to address concerns, including a presentation to the OTA board that was met with dismissal. Serrano expressed disappointment that the council had revisited the agenda item after a unanimous decision just eight weeks prior, indicating a lack of progress and continued dissatisfaction with the OTA's responses.

The discussions underscored a growing sentiment among council members and constituents that the OTA needs to improve its communication and operational practices, with calls for a more thorough investigation into its financial dealings and project management. The council is now considering waiting for a state auditor's report before proceeding further, hoping it will provide clarity and potentially lead to accountability for the OTA's actions.