During a recent government meeting, a heated discussion emerged regarding the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority's (OTA) plans for new toll roads. A local official expressed strong opposition to the OTA's proposals, arguing that the state does not require these turnpikes and that they represent a poor business model. The official highlighted that the OTA has yet to pay off any toll road, suggesting a lack of financial viability.

The official criticized the OTA's need for written agreements, questioning their power and motives. \"If they are all so powerful, why do they need something in writing from you?\" they asked, implying that the OTA's reliance on contracts indicates a vulnerability rather than dominance. The sentiment was clear: the local government should resist any agreements that could compromise the community's interests.

The discussion also touched on concerns about land use and the potential impact on residents. The official emphasized the importance of protecting homes and minimizing land acquisition for the turnpike projects. \"If we can save one home, it's worth telling them to give the least that you can,\" they stated, advocating for a stance of resistance against what they described as bullying tactics from the OTA.

Overall, the meeting underscored a growing tension between local authorities and the OTA, with officials determined to safeguard their community's interests against what they perceive as overreach by the state agency.