In a recent city council meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the lack of a compatibility study for the AirPark district in Battle Ground. Council members expressed frustration over what they believed was a miscommunication about the completion of this study, which was initially thought to be underway. One council member emphasized that the planning commission had directed Iraberg Consulting to conduct a compatibility analysis based on the R-3 zoning designation, yet it appears that this analysis was never completed.

The discussion highlighted the importance of a thorough compatibility study, especially as the council considers zoning changes that could impact the area. The member pointed out that without this analysis, any decisions made regarding zoning could lead to potential legal challenges from property owners opposed to development. The council member stressed the need for transparency and accountability from city staff, stating, \"You get paid to do your jobs... I rely upon you to tell me the truth.\"

The conversation also touched on the broader implications of zoning decisions in the AirPark area, with the council member advocating for increased density to support housing development while ensuring it does not conflict with the air park's operations. However, they expressed disappointment in the city's progress, noting that promises made regarding the study and zoning changes have not been fulfilled, leading to a perception of failure in the city's development processes.

As the council prepares for future discussions, the need for clear communication and a definitive compatibility study remains a priority to ensure that any zoning changes align with community interests and regulatory standards. The council member concluded by reflecting on the challenges of balancing development with community concerns, stating, \"We've pleased nobody... including this council member.\"