During a recent government meeting, discussions centered around a proposed variance for a residential property in Erin Prairie, raising concerns among local residents about privacy, property values, and land use.

A resident, who is seeking to acquire a retirement home, expressed a desire for a modest property featuring two bedrooms and a garage. The individual indicated a willingness to accept conditions on the variance, including a prohibition on owning dogs, and suggested that a berm could be incorporated into the property’s septic system.

However, the meeting took a turn as David Meyer, a neighboring property owner, voiced strong opposition to the variance. Meyer emphasized that when he and his wife purchased their 40-acre property, they were assured of privacy and limited development in the area. He expressed concern that the proposed development would disrupt the natural environment, affecting wildlife and diminishing his ability to hunt on his own land.

Meyer also highlighted the potential negative impact on property values, arguing that the introduction of a smaller, densely placed home could deter future buyers who prefer larger, more secluded properties. He noted that the average property value in the vicinity is significantly higher than what the proposed development would likely yield, suggesting that such a variance could set a troubling precedent for future land use decisions.

The meeting also touched on issues related to property lines and the accuracy of a new GPS system, which some residents have found problematic. Meyer mentioned that neighbors have reverted to using original property lines due to discrepancies with the GPS data, which has led to disputes over property boundaries.

As the meeting progressed, the board encouraged further testimony from residents, indicating that the discussions surrounding the variance would continue to be a focal point for community engagement and decision-making.