During a recent government meeting, a significant discussion emerged regarding the reinstatement of the \"do no harm\" policy, which had previously been abolished based on recommendations from the grading committee. Ms. Rosenzweig brought the topic back to the forefront, prompting a reconsideration that many parents had been advocating for since the policy's initial repeal.

The original decision to eliminate the policy was met with widespread discontent among parents, who felt that it contradicted the very principles of fairness and support for students. The sudden reintroduction of the topic, described as \"ducking under the radar,\" raised concerns about transparency and communication within the board.

Despite some weak arguments against the policy's reinstatement, the board ultimately voted to restore the \"do no harm\" policy, reflecting a shift towards prioritizing student welfare. This decision has been welcomed by parents who had previously expressed their frustrations over the handling of the issue. The meeting underscored the importance of open dialogue and responsiveness to community concerns in educational governance.