In a recent government meeting, community members voiced significant concerns regarding a proposed biochar project in Upper Lake, California. The discussions highlighted environmental, health, and management issues surrounding the project, which aims to utilize agricultural waste for biochar production.

Several residents questioned the project's location, suggesting it should be situated on Forest Service land instead. A representative from the Mendocino National Forest clarified that suitable land was not available for such a project, despite previous inquiries from the Scotts Valley tribe.

Barbara Morris, a local resident, raised alarms about the potential impact on an intermittent stream running through the property, which she argued was inadequately addressed in the project's environmental review. She emphasized the importance of this waterway as a wildlife corridor and expressed concerns about increased truck traffic disrupting local wildlife and the potential for pollution from diesel storage near the waterway.

Larry Khan, another resident, criticized the county's management of the property, claiming it had been mismanaged since its acquisition. He expressed frustration over the lack of communication regarding leasing opportunities and raised concerns about the project's proximity to his home, fearing noise and air pollution.

John Laboito, a local farmer, echoed these sentiments, suggesting that the project could have been better managed and that the county should require the cleanup of trash and debris on the property before proceeding. He also questioned the necessity of leasing the entire property for a project that only required a fraction of the land.

Community member Kate Parankema read a statement from Claudine Petruzzelli, another board member, who highlighted the lack of data on emissions and air quality impacts, particularly given the proximity of schools and daycares. Petruzzelli called for more thorough studies and public engagement before any permits are granted.

The meeting underscored a growing demand for transparency and community involvement in local projects, particularly those with potential environmental impacts. As discussions continue, residents are urging the county to reconsider the project's implications for public health, wildlife, and local agriculture.