In a recent debate for Utah's 4th congressional district, candidates Katrina Falak Wang and Burgess Owens tackled pressing issues ranging from social media's impact on youth to foreign policy challenges, including the ongoing conflicts in Israel and Ukraine.

Falak Wang expressed deep concern over the mental health crisis affecting children, emphasizing the need for federal intervention to address the issue. She argued for a balanced approach to social media regulation, suggesting that states should have the authority to make decisions while cautioning against potential First Amendment challenges.

The candidates also discussed the integrity of the U.S. Supreme Court, with both agreeing on the necessity of high ethical standards for federal judges. Falak Wang insisted that citizens deserve leaders with impeccable moral character, while Owens criticized perceived attacks on the court by the left when rulings do not align with their agenda.

Public trust in the Supreme Court was highlighted as a significant concern, with Falak Wang suggesting that restoring faith in leadership and addressing issues like inflation and education could help rebuild confidence. Owens echoed this sentiment, advocating for better civic education to clarify the court's role in the government.

The debate shifted to foreign policy, where Owens defended Israel's military tactics against Hamas, framing the conflict as a battle against evil. In contrast, Falak Wang identified as a pacifist, advocating for diplomatic solutions that minimize loss of life for both Israelis and Palestinians.

On the topic of Ukraine, Falak Wang affirmed the U.S. responsibility to support Ukraine against Russian aggression, while Owens stressed the importance of ensuring that American taxpayer dollars are used effectively in foreign aid, questioning the Biden administration's transparency regarding military support.

Both candidates acknowledged the potential for increased terrorism, with Falak Wang calling for adequate resources for national defense and border security. Owens expressed heightened concern over the current administration's handling of border security, citing a perceived increase in crime and threats.

As the debate concluded, it was clear that both candidates are positioning themselves to address the complex challenges facing their constituents, with a focus on ethical governance, national security, and foreign policy.