In a recent Santa Clara Unified School District meeting, educators and community members voiced strong concerns regarding the potential relocation of New Valley High School to an already impacted campus, arguing that it undermines the needs of vulnerable students. Advocates for New Valley, which serves a significant population of marginalized students, emphasized the importance of providing a dedicated and suitable campus rather than retrofitting an existing site.

Teachers and staff from New Valley highlighted the stigma associated with their school and the ongoing struggle for equitable resources. They recounted the successful advocacy of Laurelwood families in securing a new campus, questioning why New Valley students, who face similar challenges, are not afforded the same consideration. The speakers expressed frustration over the perception that alternative education programs are competing for limited resources, urging the board to prioritize the needs of all students equitably.

Concerns were raised about the safety and adequacy of current facilities, particularly for science classes, which lack essential safety features. Educators argued that moving New Valley to a repurposed elementary school would not only fail to meet their needs but also perpetuate a cycle of marginalization.

The meeting also featured voices from the Santa Clara Adult School, which serves thousands of adult learners. Administrators warned against pitting programs against one another, stressing the importance of collaboration and the need for a comprehensive approach to resource allocation that respects all student populations.

Several speakers called for a long-term vision that prioritizes the educational environment for all students, urging the board to consider the implications of their decisions on community dynamics and student well-being. The overarching message was clear: equitable access to quality education facilities is essential for fostering a supportive learning environment for all students in the district.