During a recent government meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the addition of fluoride to public water supplies, with multiple speakers advocating for a temporary or permanent halt to its use. The discussions centered around the potential health risks associated with fluoride, including its alleged links to lowered IQ, neurotoxicity, and various mental health issues.

One speaker, identified as Jennifer, emphasized the need for immediate action, arguing that the government should intervene to prevent what she described as \"forced medication.\" She cited the opinions of over 1,500 EPA scientists who have expressed concerns about fluoride's toxicity and its implications for public health. Jennifer called for a reconsideration of fluoride's use, stating that it is unethical and unconstitutional to continue its addition to water supplies without public consent.

Wendy Hartshorn, a mental health coach, echoed these sentiments, detailing the harmful effects of fluoride on brain health. She referenced over 70 studies linking fluoride exposure to reduced IQ and highlighted its potential to impair the pineal gland, which plays a crucial role in regulating sleep and hormonal functions. Hartshorn warned that calcification of the pineal gland could lead to serious health issues, including neurodegenerative diseases and increased risks of certain cancers.

The meeting concluded with a call for further public discussion on the matter, as community members expressed a desire for transparency and a reevaluation of fluoride's role in water treatment. The speakers' passionate appeals reflect a growing concern among citizens about the safety and ethics of fluoridation practices, prompting local officials to consider the implications of these health claims.