In a recent Worcester City Council meeting, significant opposition emerged against a proposed charter change, referred to as item 10 L, which seeks to require proof of citizenship for individuals running for local office. Critics argue that this proposal is a thinly veiled attack on voter rights and an attempt to sow division within the community.

Multiple residents voiced their concerns, highlighting that the existing voter registration process already ensures that only citizens can run for office. Karen Valentine Goins described the proposal as a means to harass and intimidate current and future officeholders, while John Goins emphasized the need for equality in how citizens are treated, regardless of their origin. Greg Dorschler and others echoed these sentiments, labeling the proposal as frivolous and divisive.

State Senator Robin Kennedy also spoke against the measure, asserting that it undermines the principles of inclusivity and democracy. She pointed out that the requirement could disproportionately affect immigrant communities and people of color, creating unnecessary barriers to civic engagement.

The meeting saw a strong call for unity against what many described as xenophobia and racism. Margot Barnett and other speakers urged the council to reject the proposal, framing it as a publicity stunt aimed at demonizing immigrants rather than addressing any real issues.

As the council prepares to vote on item 10 L, the implications of this proposal have sparked a broader conversation about voter rights and the treatment of immigrants in Worcester, with many residents advocating for a more inclusive approach to governance.