During a recent Worcester city council meeting, residents voiced strong opposition to proposed legislation known as 10L, which they argue could disproportionately impact immigrant communities and create unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles.

Casey Burns, a Worcester resident, criticized the lack of evidence supporting claims of widespread voter fraud, suggesting that the proposal serves to instill fear among immigrants rather than address legitimate concerns. Burns highlighted the importance of civic engagement and equity, expressing disappointment at the behavior of some audience members during the meeting, which he described as disrespectful to those advocating for community interests.

Liz Lytle, a local social studies teacher, echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the negative message that 10L sends to students of color and immigrants. She urged council members to reject the proposal, arguing that it is exclusionary and undermines the inclusive values that Worcester should represent.

Diana Kong, another resident, raised concerns about the potential for increased bureaucracy and questioned the necessity of the proposal, given existing systems already in place to address related issues.

The discussions reflect a growing concern among community members about the implications of 10L, with calls for councilors to consider the broader impact on Worcester's diverse population. As the council deliberates, residents are hopeful for a decision that aligns with the city's commitment to inclusivity and civic participation.