Residents of Katy, Texas, voiced strong opposition during a recent city council meeting regarding a proposed lithium battery storage facility by Vesper Energy. Concerns centered around the potential hazards associated with lithium batteries, particularly their proximity to schools and residential areas.

One resident, a dentist, highlighted the dangers of chemicals involved in battery storage, specifically mentioning hydrofluoric acid, which can be lethal even in small quantities. He expressed fears that a fire at the facility could release toxic gases, endangering children and the community. \"If we approve this, it may not leak the first year or two, but after it does leak, this company has only been in existence for four years,\" he warned, emphasizing the long-term risks.

Julia Edwards, another resident, raised concerns about inadequate communication from the company regarding the project and the lack of ecological studies. She pointed out that the facility could exacerbate flooding issues in the area, particularly given Katy's history with severe floods.

Lee Casino, a local resident, echoed these sentiments, stating that the community should not partner with a company that lacks a proven track record in operating such facilities. He emphasized the need for a safe environment for residents, especially children.

Several speakers, including teachers and parents, expressed worries about the facility's location near Katy High School and the potential for environmental damage. Kelly Knight, a science teacher, noted that the facility would pose a substantial threat to both people and the environment, citing the hazardous materials involved and the risk of overheating and fires.

Residents also questioned Vesper Energy's experience and emergency response plans, with some suggesting that the company’s financial motivations could overshadow community safety. \"Learning as we go puts too much safety and too much liability with unknowns on the city,\" Casino stated.

The council meeting highlighted a community deeply concerned about the implications of the proposed facility, with many residents urging city officials to vote against the project to protect their neighborhoods and schools from potential hazards.