During a recent Lewisville Independent School District (LISD) board meeting, community members voiced their concerns regarding proposed campus retirements and the district's budget deficit. The meeting featured public comments from parents and stakeholders who emphasized the importance of maintaining local schools and the negative implications of potential closures.

Matthew Enslin, a parent and architectural project manager, highlighted the significance of schools as community hubs, arguing that some campuses are integral to their neighborhoods and should not be abandoned. He urged the board to consider the long-term impact of their decisions on students and families, advocating for a holistic approach to resource allocation that aligns with the district's goals.

Ryan Witter expressed frustration over the state’s underfunding of education, pointing out that despite a significant budget surplus, the district faces a $4.5 million deficit. He criticized the idea that closing schools would resolve financial issues, noting that such actions would only lead to further complications, including overcrowding in remaining schools.

Jennifer Webb, a parent of students at Polser Elementary, questioned why a school that meets all efficiency criteria is on the retirement list. She expressed concern that closing smaller campuses could lead to a decline in enrollment and funding, as families might choose to leave the district for other educational options. Webb emphasized the need for effective decision-making that prioritizes educational quality over mere financial efficiency.

Amber Clark echoed these sentiments, highlighting the unique STEM programs at Polser Elementary that attract families to the district. She argued that closing the school would not only diminish educational opportunities but also negatively impact the district's reputation and enrollment.

The meeting underscored a growing tension between fiscal responsibility and the community's desire to preserve local schools. Stakeholders called for the board to seek long-term solutions rather than short-term fixes, urging them to advocate for better funding from state officials to support public education. The discussions reflect a broader concern about the future of education in the district and the need for a collaborative approach to address ongoing challenges.