The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission convened to discuss the Rolling Hills Subdivision's request for annexation and a conditional use permit for a multifamily building. The proposal involves annexing 6.9 acres of land from Ada County to the city, with plans for 64 multifamily units and two vertically integrated buildings containing 90 dwelling units and commercial space.

Staff presented concerns regarding the integration of the project within the surrounding area, particularly due to the presence of a county enclave that would remain unannexed. This enclave complicates the development's connectivity and raises questions about future road access, especially concerning a designated collector road that is part of the Ada County Highway District's master plan.

The applicant, Wade Thomas, acknowledged the challenges posed by the enclave and the need for a cohesive design that respects the existing rural character of the neighborhood. He emphasized the project's intention to create a community feel, integrating commercial spaces that could serve local needs, such as healthcare services.

Public testimony revealed significant opposition from local residents, who expressed concerns about the impact of increased density on traffic, infrastructure, and the rural lifestyle of the area. Residents highlighted issues such as inadequate road conditions, safety concerns for pedestrians, and the potential for diminished property values due to the proximity of a four-story building.

Commissioners voiced mixed opinions, with some acknowledging the project's alignment with the city's mixed-use regional plan while others raised concerns about the lack of transitional space and the potential isolation of the enclave. Ultimately, several commissioners indicated they could not support the project as proposed, citing the need for a more integrated approach that considers the long-term development of the area.

The commission's deliberations underscored the complexities of urban planning in rapidly developing regions, balancing the demands for housing with the preservation of community character and infrastructure readiness. The outcome of the proposal remains uncertain as the commission weighs the merits of the application against the concerns raised by residents and staff.