Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Neighbors clash over noise and lights from batting cage

October 29, 2024 | New Canaan, Fairfield, Connecticut


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Neighbors clash over noise and lights from batting cage
In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around a contentious application for a batting cage that has raised significant concerns among neighboring residents regarding noise and lighting. The meeting was prompted by a late letter submitted by a neighbor, which highlighted complaints about the noise generated by metal bats and the potential for disruptive lighting.

During the meeting, it was revealed that the applicant was open to limiting the hours of operation for the batting cage, suggesting a possible cutoff time of 9 PM during summer months. This proposal aimed to address concerns from residents who fear that the noise, particularly from aluminum bats—which can reach levels of 120 decibels—would disrupt their peace. Comparatively, the sound from a tennis court is only about 60 decibels, illustrating the significant difference in noise levels.

Residents voiced their frustrations, with one attorney representing a neighbor emphasizing the need for a continuance to allow for further research and preparation regarding the noise levels and the impact of the proposed lighting. The attorney argued that the current setup, which lacked adequate soundproofing and screening, was unacceptable and could violate local regulations concerning quiet enjoyment.

Another resident echoed these sentiments, expressing that while they did not oppose the batting cage itself, they sought reasonable limitations to ensure that the enjoyment of their own properties was not compromised. The discussion highlighted the need for landscaping plans to mitigate visibility and noise, as well as a thorough review of the lighting setup.

The commissioners acknowledged the concerns raised and suggested that a continuance might be beneficial, allowing both the applicant and the residents to further refine their positions and proposals. The meeting concluded with a commitment to revisit the application, ensuring that all parties have adequate time to prepare and address the issues at hand.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Connecticut articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI