During a recent government meeting, a member of the public expressed frustration over the perceived lack of engagement from officials during public interactions. The speaker criticized the atmosphere of the meetings, describing it as one where officials appeared disinterested and dismissive, likening their demeanor to \"Stonewall.\" They highlighted a stark contrast between the officials' camaraderie during photo opportunities and the lack of responsiveness to public input, suggesting that citizens feel like \"little puppets\" in a process that seems to tolerate their presence rather than welcome it.

The speaker called for a reevaluation of the protocol governing public interactions, emphasizing the need for genuine dialogue rather than a one-sided exchange. They lamented the current state of affairs, stating that the process has devolved into a situation where public input feels more like an obligation than a valued contribution.

Following this public comment, the meeting proceeded with announcements regarding upcoming sessions, including a work session scheduled for October 22 and additional meetings throughout November. The officials encouraged participation from the public, although the earlier comments raised questions about the effectiveness of such engagement.