During a recent commission meeting, a proposal for an attached pergola at a residential property was met with significant scrutiny and discussion. The proposal, presented by Keith Modlin of PMH Construction on behalf of homeowner Ryan Ferguson, aimed to install a pergola that would be affixed to the rear of the house, featuring a full shingle roof for weatherproofing.

Commission staff expressed concerns regarding the attachment of the pergola to the house, emphasizing that such structures should ideally be freestanding to avoid complications related to moisture accumulation and structural integrity. The staff recommended a continuance of the proposal, suggesting that a detached pergola or accessory structure would be more appropriate.

Modlin defended the design, explaining that the pergola would be constructed using composite blocks attached to the roof rafters, allowing for easy removal if necessary. He argued that the structure would not detract from the historical appearance of the home, as it would not be visible from the street due to surrounding trees.

Commissioners engaged in a detailed discussion about the construction methods and aesthetic implications of the proposed pergola. Some members expressed a preference for a freestanding design, citing concerns about the low slope of the proposed roof and the potential for water leakage. They noted that traditional asphalt shingles may not be suitable for such a flat roof design, suggesting alternatives like a corrugated metal top or a true porch addition that would align with the home's architectural style.

Ultimately, the commission indicated a willingness to consider a revised proposal that adheres to the guidelines for freestanding structures. The applicant was encouraged to explore these alternatives and return with a design that addresses the commission's concerns regarding aesthetics and structural integrity. No public comments were made during the meeting regarding the proposal.