Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Historic Commission Rejects Controversial Retaining Wall Proposal

October 29, 2024 | Land Preservation Commission, New York City Board & Committees, New York City, New York County, New York


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Historic Commission Rejects Controversial Retaining Wall Proposal
In a recent meeting of the Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC), discussions centered on the construction of a retaining wall at 2103 Albaum, with significant input from community members and commissioners regarding materials and height. The Historic District Council (HDC) expressed a preference for a red brick wall, aligning with the predominant materials used in the area, while the Victorian Society in New York supported the construction of a retaining wall but emphasized that it should match the existing red brick of nearby houses.

Jeremy Woodof from the Victorian Society highlighted that 80% of retaining walls in the district are made of red brick, urging the commission to require this material for the proposed wall. He also suggested that the wall's height be reduced to maintain the original concept of an unobstructed view between houses and the public sidewalk.

The applicant, however, indicated a reluctance to use brick, citing difficulties in matching the existing brick of the house and expressing a preference for a different material. This led to a broader discussion among commissioners, who largely agreed that the wall should be lowered to a maximum height of 24 inches and constructed from brick to preserve the historic character of the neighborhood.

Commissioners noted that the proposed 34-inch wall was inconsistent with the lower walls typically found in the district, which detracted from the area's architectural integrity. They unanimously recommended denying the current proposal, suggesting that the applicant work with LPC staff to find a suitable solution that adheres to the district's guidelines.

The meeting concluded with a motion to deny the application as it stood, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the uniformity and charm of the historic block. The commission encouraged the applicant to collaborate with staff to explore options that would align with the community's historical aesthetic.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New York articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI