During a recent government meeting, a Petersburg resident passionately addressed the loss of the community's superior judgeship, a significant legal position that has been a part of the town's history since its founding. The speaker, who represents both himself and the larger Petersburg community, expressed concern that many residents are unaware of the implications of this judicial change, which he argues has financial and legal repercussions for the community.

The resident recounted the history of judicial representation in Petersburg, noting that the town had maintained a superior judgeship for decades until it was moved to Ketchikan during the pandemic. He emphasized that this transition was not only a loss of a critical legal resource but also a violation of the U.S. Constitution's separation of powers doctrine. The speaker highlighted the efforts of Ernie Haugen, who fought for the establishment of the superior judgeship in the early 1980s, underscoring the importance of this position for the community.

Currently, Petersburg is served by a magistrate, which the speaker criticized as inadequate for handling complex legal matters. He pointed out that residents are now forced to travel to Ketchikan or Juneau for court cases involving child custody, divorce, and other significant legal issues, which he deemed unfair. The speaker called for a restoration of at least the district judgeship that existed prior to 1982, arguing that the community deserves better access to judicial resources.

The discussion reflects broader concerns about judicial representation and access to legal services in smaller communities, highlighting the ongoing struggle for Petersburg to reclaim its judicial standing.