During a recent council meeting, residents of the High Bank Apartments voiced their concerns regarding eviction notices they received amid a redevelopment proposal. One resident highlighted the urgency of their situation, stating that 17 families have been ordered to vacate their homes by the end of the year, despite the lack of a confirmed construction timeline or necessary state permits for the proposed project.

The resident argued that the eviction process appears to be premature and detrimental, especially given the city's ongoing affordable housing crisis. They urged the council to negotiate with the new property owners to reconsider the eviction timeline, emphasizing that forcing families out during the holiday season is unjust and lacks transparency regarding the reasons for such actions.

Another resident, Mary Fondy, echoed these sentiments, advocating for the protection of residents living near the bay, similar to the protections afforded to those in historic districts. She called for a thorough environmental study before any evictions take place, suggesting that the council allow time for residents to remain in their homes while these assessments are conducted.

In a separate discussion, Susanna Slaughter raised concerns about inappropriate artwork on a vacated Walgreens property, seeking clarity on the city's plans for cleanup. The council responded, assuring her that the property owner had been contacted and cleanup was scheduled for the following day.

The meeting underscored the tension between redevelopment efforts and the rights of current residents, as well as the council's commitment to addressing community concerns.