In a recent county legislature meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the adherence to established budgetary procedures as outlined in the county charter and administrative code. Legislators expressed frustration over what they perceived as a failure to follow legal requirements in the budget formation process, particularly the lack of resolutions adopting comprehensive financial management policies and performance measures prior to the county executive's budget proposal.

One legislator highlighted that the county charter mandates the legislature to adopt specific goals and objectives annually, a requirement they claimed was overlooked this year. The discussion emphasized the importance of the legislature's role in shaping budgetary policy rather than merely reacting to the executive's proposals. This sentiment was echoed by multiple members who called for a more proactive approach in future budget cycles.

The meeting also touched on the proposed budget's impact on the county tax levy, with some legislators questioning the accuracy of the figures presented. One member noted a proposed increase in the tax levy of $1.9 million, while others defended the budget as a reduction in the overall tax burden for residents.

Despite the contentious atmosphere, some legislators praised the budget hearings conducted by the county executive's office, describing them as informative and well-organized. However, concerns about attendance during budget discussions were raised, with claims that not all committee members were present during critical deliberations.

As the meeting concluded, legislators expressed a desire for improved compliance with the charter and a commitment to more thorough discussions in future budget processes, underscoring the need for accountability and transparency in county governance.